<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>&#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</provider_name><provider_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu</provider_url><author_name>Hristo Kirilov</author_name><author_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/author/hristo-kirilov/</author_url><title>THE CODIFICATION OF IN-HOUSE PROCUREMENT IN DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU - &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/the-codification-of-in-house-procurement-in-directive-201424eu-in-the-light-of-the-case-law-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu/"&gt;THE CODIFICATION OF IN-HOUSE PROCUREMENT IN DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(d,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){var r,a,i,s,n,o=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]');for(r=0;r&lt;c.length;r++)c[r].style.display="none";for(r=0;r&lt;o.length;r++)if(a=o[r],e.source===a.contentWindow){if(a.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;a.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),n=l.createElement("a"),s.href=a.getAttribute("src"),n.href=t.value,n.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===a)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),d.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!o){o=!0;var e,t,r,a,i=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),s=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),n=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content");for(t=0;t&lt;n.length;t++){if(!(r=n[t]).getAttribute("data-secret"))a=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),r.src+="#?secret="+a,r.setAttribute("data-secret",a);if(i||s)(e=r.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),r.parentNode.replaceChild(e,r)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/the-codification-of-in-house-procurement-in-directive-201424eu-in-the-light-of-the-case-law-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;THE CODIFICATION OF IN-HOUSE PROCUREMENT IN DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU&#x201D; &#x2014; &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>(Overview of the Relevant Case law) Ivaylo Dimitrov[1] &#xA0; Abstract The in-house exception has been unexplored in Bulgarian literature which may be explained by the lack of legislative rules on the matter, at least before the latest amendment of the Public Procurement Act in force since July and October 2014. The fact that in-house rules [&#x2026;]</description></oembed>
