<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>&#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</provider_name><provider_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu</provider_url><author_name>Hristo Kirilov</author_name><author_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/author/hristo-kirilov/</author_url><title>THE ACHMEA JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION - &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/21-29/"&gt;THE ACHMEA JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(d,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){var r,a,i,s,n,o=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]');for(r=0;r&lt;c.length;r++)c[r].style.display="none";for(r=0;r&lt;o.length;r++)if(a=o[r],e.source===a.contentWindow){if(a.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;a.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),n=l.createElement("a"),s.href=a.getAttribute("src"),n.href=t.value,n.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===a)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),d.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!o){o=!0;var e,t,r,a,i=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),s=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),n=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content");for(t=0;t&lt;n.length;t++){if(!(r=n[t]).getAttribute("data-secret"))a=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),r.src+="#?secret="+a,r.setAttribute("data-secret",a);if(i||s)(e=r.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),r.parentNode.replaceChild(e,r)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/21-29/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;THE ACHMEA JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION&#x201D; &#x2014; &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>Judgment of 06 March 2018, Achmea, C&#x2011;284/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:158 Oleg Temnikov[1] &#xA0; This article provides an overview and the author&#x2019;s comments on the Judgment of the ECJ in the Achmea case. According to the author, the Achmea Judgment is of paramount importance for international investment law and arbitration and their relationship with EU law. After a [&#x2026;]</description></oembed>
