<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>&#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</provider_name><provider_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu</provider_url><author_name>Hristo Kirilov</author_name><author_url>https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/author/hristo-kirilov/</author_url><title>Tying and Bundling according to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Bulgarian Commission for Protection of Competition - &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/19-31/"&gt;Tying and Bundling according to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Bulgarian Commission for Protection of Competition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(d,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){var r,a,i,s,n,o=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]');for(r=0;r&lt;c.length;r++)c[r].style.display="none";for(r=0;r&lt;o.length;r++)if(a=o[r],e.source===a.contentWindow){if(a.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;a.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),n=l.createElement("a"),s.href=a.getAttribute("src"),n.href=t.value,n.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===a)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),d.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!o){o=!0;var e,t,r,a,i=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),s=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),n=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content");for(t=0;t&lt;n.length;t++){if(!(r=n[t]).getAttribute("data-secret"))a=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),r.src+="#?secret="+a,r.setAttribute("data-secret",a);if(i||s)(e=r.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),r.parentNode.replaceChild(e,r)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/19-31/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Tying and Bundling according to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Bulgarian Commission for Protection of Competition&#x201D; &#x2014; &#x415;&#x432;&#x440;&#x43E;&#x43F;&#x435;&#x439;&#x441;&#x43A;&#x438; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x430;&#x432;&#x435;&#x43D; &#x43F;&#x440;&#x435;&#x433;&#x43B;&#x435;&#x434;" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>Eleonora Mateina[1] &#xA0; The purpose behind the article is to summaries and briefly analyse the key decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Commission (Decision dated 17 September 2007 in case T-201/04 R, Microsoft/Commission; Decision dated 12 December 1991 in case &#x422;-30/89, Hilti/ Commission and Decision dated 24 July [&#x2026;]</description></oembed>
